Rabu, 23 Januari 2013

SABAH : THE TRUTH WILL SET THE PEOPLE FREE

It is important that the general public waits until  the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) completes  its work and announces its findings before it draws  conclusions about the motives behind the  issuance of Malaysian identity documents to  foreigners in the past.

Only then would people in both Sabah and  Peninsular Malaysia have a clear picture of what  really happened, and why.

If statements by individual witnesses are viewed as  the entire truth, we may fall into the trap of  subscribing to partial accounts of a complex  reality.

After all, the statements issued by some  witnesses on the third day of the Inquiry were  contradicted by subsequent testimonies on the  fourth and fifth days.

This is what one should expect in an open and  honest investigation.

Establishing a Royal Commission on such a  contentious and controversial issue which has  been at the core of Sabah politics for more than  three decades was an act of tremendous courage  on the part of the Najib Government.

It demonstrates a readiness to embrace the truth  however painful it may be.

It is only when the whole truth is known that the  multi-religious and multi-cultural people of Sabah  will be rid of misgivings, doubts and suspicions  which have sullied their hitherto harmonious  inter-ethnic ties.

To enable the truth to set the people free, they  should not overlook a critical dimension in the  issuance of Malaysian identity documents and  indeed, the conferment of citizenship upon  foreigners.

A significant portion of those who sought refuge in  Sabah from the seventies onwards comprised the  tragic victims of a protracted war in Mindanao  which has just ended.

This is the humanitarian aspect of citizenship  which a civilised state must uphold if it is genuinely  committed to compassion and justice.
 
There are other angles to citizenship which were  among the principal considerations in the  accommodation of recently domiciled Chinese and  Indian communities in Malaya (Peninsular  Malaysia) on the eve of Merdeka in 1957.

 Their role in the crucial tin and rubber sectors of  the economy, the threat posed by the largely  Chinese communist insurgency, and the need for  inter-ethnic cooperation in the drive towards  Merdekawere some of the principal reasons why a  million Chinese and Indians were conferred  citizenship in the twinkling of an eye.

 As Dr. Mahathir Mohamad has correctly  observed, the UMNO elite was even prepared to  set aside conventional citizenship norms in order  to bring the new Malayans abroad.

 This was in stark contrast to the approach  adopted by leaders in other similarly divided  societies --- societies in which an  indigenous-non-indigenous dichotomy had  developedas a result of colonial rule such as  Indonesia and Burma (Myanmar)--- where the  rules of citizenship were stringently applied so as  to ensure the assimilation of the foreign  component.

In Malaysia, on the other hand, accommodation of  the other changed the landscape drastically.

 The people who had given the land its identity  through Malay Sultanates that have existed for  hundreds of years were now relegated to a  community among communities.

 In other words, by extending citizenship to the  Chinese and Indians on such generous terms, the  very character of the nascent nation had  changed.

 Adjusting Malay rights arising from this  consciousness of a Malay land with the interests of  the non-Malays through integration via common  citizenship in a larger Malaysian nation has  remained themost fundamental challenge of the  last 55 years.
 In a sense, Sabah, by conferring citizenship upon  the migrants from its neighbourhood,in the  eighties and nineties, has also experienced a  parallel, though different, transformation.

 The non-Muslim Bumiputra component of the  population which was the largest segment of a  multi-religious society at the time of the state's  incorporation into Malaysia in 1963,lost its lead  position to the Muslim Bumiputra component.

 The angst and anxiety this has created in various  circles is understandable and should be  addressed with much empathy.

Harmonising the interests of these two segments  with the non-Muslim, non-Bumiputra elements,  calls for astute statesmanship and dexterity.

  In this regard, Sabah is fortunate to have as one of  its foremost leaders a person like Tan Sri Joseph  PairinKittinganwhose  political maturity and  wisdom have helped to sustain an appreciable  degree of inter-religious and inter-cultural peace.

Dr. Chandra Muzaffar is the Chairman of the  board of Trustees of Yayasan 1Malaysia.

Petaling Jaya.

21 January 2013.



Tiada ulasan: